Skip to main content

Transportation


When I first started this graduate program, I was amazed with how big public transportation is in San Francisco. In Stockton, my hometown, public transportation is not as big and could be better in my opinion. The majority of Stockton residents drive their own car and public transportation is usually only utilized by the low income. The only time I actually used public transportation was when I was living in Chico, CA during my undergraduate program. Chico is a college town where everyone rides their bus or bike. I had my own car and would still ride my bike or take the bus whenever I could. However, now that I am back in my hometown, I solely rely on my car. The reason behind this is because my hometown is a community that has a high dependence on automobiles and is not environmentally built for alternative modes of transportation.

After reading this weeks readings, it made me realize that using public transportation can actually be beneficial to my health. Organizations should promote health by encouraging activities that use alternative transportation such as bike-to-work events. It was very interesting to read that those who live by highways are at higher risk for respiratory conditions. Public transportation is not only good for your health but also to the environment because it produces less carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and less carbon dioxide compared to private cars. Because public transportation has been found to benefit health, reduce social inequalities, and lower the risk of obesity, transportation policy should work towards implementing policies that improve public transportation so that more people can use it. In conclusion, as the reading stated, transportation policy should improve public health rather than hider it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Green Chemistry

I have never thought about chemistry in a sustainable way and it was really interesting to learn about this as it was a new concept for me. My favorite part was learning about the difference between green chemistry and cleaning up pollution. Green chemistry reduces pollution while cleaning up pollution includes cleaning up environmental spills (and other releases) and treating waste streams. I think green chemistry is great for human health by providing cleaner water, air, i ncreased safety for workers in the chemical industry, s afer consumer products, safer food, and less exposure to chemicals. Green chemistry reduces the risk of exposure to chemicals of concern to human health and the environment across life cycle. It helps r educe exposure across the globe and aims to have healthier communities, materials, products, people and planet.  The 12 principles really helped me better understand how green chemistry reduces risk and minimizes environmental footprint. They serve as ...

Chemical Policy Reform

The background subject I chose to blog about is "Give the Public and Workers the Full Right-to-Know and Participate." I agree with this paper that we have every right to know about the chemicals we are exposed to. Policy makers and public health professionals need to come together and develop laws and practices that make it mandatory to inform workers and communities of toxic chemical sources and exposures. This paper does a great job at examining current limitations in disclosure policies. I like this papers approach, "Right to Know"basically saying that workers and the public shouldn't have to find out about exposures through government documents, it should be routine and systematic to report and let the public and workers know of any toxic chemicals or other environmental health hazards that we are being exposed to.

Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR) and water quality

What is the source of your drinking water? Where does your water ORIGINATE?  Water System Name: Morada Acres Water System  Type of Water Source: Groundwater wells What chemicals were found in your water that were higher than expected? Detection of Contaminants with a PRIMARY Drinking Water Standard: *There have been no contaminants detected in the water supply, however the source is still considered vulnerable to activities located near the drinking water source. See below: Gross Alpha Activity (pCi/L) 2010 2.90 1.76 – 5.11 15 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Uranium (pCi/L) 2010 4.92 – 20 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Radium 228 (pCi/L) 2006 0.11 0.10–0.12 5 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Arsenic (ppb) 2007 2 – 10 0.004 Erosion of natural deposits; run-off from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes Barium (ppb) 2008 130 – 1000 2 Oil drilling and metal refinery waste discharge; erosion of natural deposits Chromium (ppb) 2008 6 – 50 2.5 Disc...