Skip to main content

Personal Care Products


Product 1: Dove Deodorant 
My deodorant scored in the moderate hazard range. Although the range for cancer was low, it was still alarming to see that there was a small risk for cancer. I have heard and read that some deodorants cause cancer, but I never would have thought that mine could be on the list. Another thing that was alarming was the moderate concerns for organ system toxicity (non-reproductive). I buy this deodorant because it smells really good and the fragrance ingredient is actually the worst ingredient in this product scoring in the high hazard range. Although most ingredients were low hazard, there were a few that were moderate which was eye opening for me. Due to the cancer risk, I will be changing my deodorant to one of the low hazard deodorants such as the Thai Deodorant Stone that I found on the EWG website. Although I believe everyone should know about the risks in their products, I don't think they do because it's not something that is listed clearly and legibly on the packaging of the products. In my opinion, I think it should be because it is extremely important to our health. 
Product 2: Joico Conditioning Shampoo

I was very surprised and happy to see that my shampoo scored a 1 which is considered an overall low hazard product. My shampoo had no risks for cancer or developmental and reproductive toxicity. It scored low in allergies and immunotoxicity and moderate in use restrictions. Because this product scored low and is in the safe range, I will continue to use this and also let my family and friends know about it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Green Chemistry

I have never thought about chemistry in a sustainable way and it was really interesting to learn about this as it was a new concept for me. My favorite part was learning about the difference between green chemistry and cleaning up pollution. Green chemistry reduces pollution while cleaning up pollution includes cleaning up environmental spills (and other releases) and treating waste streams. I think green chemistry is great for human health by providing cleaner water, air, i ncreased safety for workers in the chemical industry, s afer consumer products, safer food, and less exposure to chemicals. Green chemistry reduces the risk of exposure to chemicals of concern to human health and the environment across life cycle. It helps r educe exposure across the globe and aims to have healthier communities, materials, products, people and planet.  The 12 principles really helped me better understand how green chemistry reduces risk and minimizes environmental footprint. They serve as ...

Chemical Policy Reform

The background subject I chose to blog about is "Give the Public and Workers the Full Right-to-Know and Participate." I agree with this paper that we have every right to know about the chemicals we are exposed to. Policy makers and public health professionals need to come together and develop laws and practices that make it mandatory to inform workers and communities of toxic chemical sources and exposures. This paper does a great job at examining current limitations in disclosure policies. I like this papers approach, "Right to Know"basically saying that workers and the public shouldn't have to find out about exposures through government documents, it should be routine and systematic to report and let the public and workers know of any toxic chemicals or other environmental health hazards that we are being exposed to.

Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR) and water quality

What is the source of your drinking water? Where does your water ORIGINATE?  Water System Name: Morada Acres Water System  Type of Water Source: Groundwater wells What chemicals were found in your water that were higher than expected? Detection of Contaminants with a PRIMARY Drinking Water Standard: *There have been no contaminants detected in the water supply, however the source is still considered vulnerable to activities located near the drinking water source. See below: Gross Alpha Activity (pCi/L) 2010 2.90 1.76 – 5.11 15 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Uranium (pCi/L) 2010 4.92 – 20 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Radium 228 (pCi/L) 2006 0.11 0.10–0.12 5 N/A Erosion of natural deposits Arsenic (ppb) 2007 2 – 10 0.004 Erosion of natural deposits; run-off from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes Barium (ppb) 2008 130 – 1000 2 Oil drilling and metal refinery waste discharge; erosion of natural deposits Chromium (ppb) 2008 6 – 50 2.5 Disc...